Minnesota accessibility requirements for government vendors
The statute still names WCAG 2.0 — read the current state standard before you promise anything.
Minn. Stat. § 16E.03, subd. 9 (with subd. 10)
01 — Standard
What the instrument actually requires
The statute directs the chief information officer to develop accessibility standards for technology, software and hardware procurement, and requires those standards to incorporate “section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act” and “the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, 2.0,” with provision to review and update them.
Source: Minn. Stat. § 16E.03, subd. 9 ↗
02 — Coverage
Who it covers, and who it does not
The CIO “shall require state agencies to adhere to the standards developed under this subdivision unless an exception is approved,” and exceptions may be granted by the CIO on agency request. Infrastructure hardware is carved out of the procurement standards.
Source: Minn. Stat. § 16E.03, subds. 9–10 ↗
What this means for a SLED contractor
§ 16E.03 is a state-agency instrument. Minnesota county, city and school work runs on Title II and on the buyer’s contract, not on this section.
03 — Dates
The dates a bid calendar has to respect
The statute sets no compliance date of its own. Standards may be modified where the CIO finds they impose an undue burden on the state, and that finding must be written.
Source: Minn. Stat. § 16E.03, subd. 9 ↗
04 — The ask
What it asks a vendor to hand over
The statute places no direct obligation on vendors. It obliges agencies to buy to the CIO’s standards, which is how the requirement reaches you — through the solicitation and the contract rather than through the statute.
Source: Minn. Stat. § 16E.03, subd. 9 ↗
05 — Fit
Where a dated structural scan fits here
The version gap is the practical point. The statutory floor names WCAG 2.0 while the federal Title II standard and most buyer contract language are at 2.1 AA, so a Minnesota deliverable is usually being measured against the higher of the two. Build and document to WCAG 2.1 AA and the statutory floor takes care of itself; the risk is the vendor who reads “2.0” in the statute and scopes down to it.
BidShield ADA produces a dated WCAG 2.1 AA structural-scan record and an audit-defense log. Automated testing detects only a portion of accessibility barriers and cannot replace manual review, so nothing it produces is a WCAG conformance claim, an ADA or Section 508 compliance certification, an Accessibility Conformance Report, or a legal opinion.
06 — Depth
Go deeper
Have the record before Minnesota asks for it
BidShield ADA's Contractor's Defense Bundle gives you a dated, exportable WCAG 2.1 AA structural-scan and audit-defense log for $299. Not a compliance certification — a defensible record.
Get StartedEvery claim on this page was read from the linked primary source on 2026-07-28. Statutes, rules and agency standards change; check the source before relying on any of it. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel for guidance specific to your situation.